Video of rooftop helicopter rescue in Japan's tsunami-hit town

9500 People Missing In ONE Japanese Coastal Town

Oh the heights of irony...

Supposed experts interviewed by ABC News claim it is unethical to refuse the vaccine. “Does Americans’ right to determine what is best for themselves and their families trump the federal government’s efforts to head off what it believes could be a flu pandemic?” writes Patrick Jonsson for ABC News. “The US government says it has no intention of forcing vaccinations, but its entire flu strategy could be undermined – endangering public health, they say – if a substantial portion of the US population opts out of the $3 billion program.”

The corporate media’s own polls reveal that around two-thirds of parents have serious reservations about the vaccines’ effectiveness and safety. Millions of people simply distrust the government and do not buy into the propaganda.

“Many of the concerns by parents are based on the perception that this vaccine has been rushed into production and may not be safe,” Tom Skinner, a CDC spokesman, told Fox News. “We understand parents’ concerns – they want what is best for their children. We often tell people the best antidote for fear is information. And we ask them to really seek out sound and reliable information from sources they trust.”

According to the CDC, parents need to stop listening to a large number of doctors and virologists who say the vaccines are dangerous and instead get their information exclusively from the corporate media.

Corporate Media: Is Not Taking the Vaccine Unethical?
Kurt Nimmo, Infowars, October 12, 2009

I honestly don't even know where to begin... So the same media outlets that for years have been lying about things they did report on while covering up other things they had an obvious ethical obligation to report on are now trying to tell me what's ethical and what is not. The same people who have no problem quoting unnamed anonymous sources as if their words were the Gospel are now trying to teach me ethics.

Hey, ABC, where were you for Ellen Mariani? Because, see, your viewers may have cared to know that some of the victims of the crime of the century were less than happy about the story they were told about that crime. They may have also cared to know that the most serious post-9/11 terror attack on the US soil was planned not by a Muslim group but by American-born White anti-government extremists. Or those of your viewers who are concerned about their finances -and who isn't? - might want to know what their money is really worth. To that end would be nice of you to try and give them an idea as to what the Federal Reserve is all about. Strangely, I can not recall you ever covering the topic.

Just to clarify things a bit - this rant is not exclusively directed at the ABC News as pretty much all the major news outlets in the US and in much of the Western World act rather similarly. Well, they seem to be owned by pretty much the same group of players so why should that not be so?

Be that as it may - I would very much rather have an old whore extol the virtues of chastity to me than have mainstream media tell me what is or is not ethical for the simple reason that I expect the former to be far more entertaining than the latter. OK, mainstream media, now that you've heard this little rant - carry on. Keep on doin' Pravda and Der Sturmer proud!

"I Love My Country" by Larken Rose

YouTube link

Ain in-depth comment by the author:

About the only complaint, which I got second hand, was that someone didn't like me making fun of his flag and his freedom. Well, the song doesn't make fun of the flag, but it does make fun of his LACK of freedom. What I suspect the person actually felt was that I was mocking his version of patriotism. And in a way, I probably was.

Occasionally someone tells me I'm a "true patriot." I assume they mean it to be nice, but I'm not fond of "patriotism" at all. What I'm loyal to, and what I love, is not about an imaginary line around a piece of dirt, or about people who live inside such a line. It's not about any flag, or any republic "for which it stands." What I care about is humanity, which requires free will, which in turn requires liberty. I don't much care WHERE it happens, or to whom it happens. I don't want freedom any less for the guy in Alberta than I do for the guy in New Mexico, nor do I feel any special connection or bond to one over the other.

The trouble is, what most people call "patriotism" is nothing but mindless pack mentality. They "love" what they call their country based purely on the ACCIDENT of where they were born. So, it follows, if they were born in Germany in 1900, they would have ended up as "patriotic" Nazis. What would be good about that?

Other people, when they speak of "patriotism," mean loyalty to the idea of FREEDOM, because of the role that idea played in the creation of this country. Okay, THAT is something worth feeling attached to, even if the idea was mangled and corrupted along the way (from the very beginning, actually). But I think the difference in how people react to my silly video depends upon WHAT they are loyal to. If they are loyal to a flag, or a piece of dirt, they will probably feel insulted by it. And they should be. If, on the other hand, they are loyal to the idea of FREEDOM, I think they will completely approve of the message.

Sincerely,
Larken Rose
http://www.larkenrose.com

U.S. Army prepares to invade U.S.

The plans to implement martial law in America have been taking shape for decades, hidden behind "Continuity of Government" contingency planning. Now, with public outcry over the banker bailout bill at fever pitch, all of the pieces are in place for the U.S. Army to start policing American citizens.

For more information and analysis, please visit

http://www.corbettreport.com

YouTube link

"Improbable Collapse : The Demolition of our Republic"

Michael Berger
1 hr 9 min 8 sec - Oct 9, 2006
www.improbablecollapse.com

A look at the collapse of the WTC Towers and WTC 7 by scholars for 9/11 truth. To learn more about the 9/11 attacks, visit www.truth911.net; to buy the DVD and support the filmmaker's hard work and personal investment go to www.improbablecollapse.com

Google Video link

“Activism is Terrorism”

Reprinted from WEARECHANGE.ORG. The reason I decided to reprint this report is due to the fact that WEARECHANGE.ORG does not provide a dedicated link to each of its reports.

This report does an excellent job of illustrating how US authorities try to censor and suppress those who challenge the official theory of 9/11 and seek to educate their fellow citizens about the truth regarding those events. While some of the footage provided below was shot in locations as prominent as the WTC site in Lower Manhattan or even in front of the New York Times Building itself you most likely will not read about this in any mainstream publication in the US. The reason for that is a policy of self-censorship to which most of the media sources adhere. However, whether they cover it or not, the 9/11 Truth Movement is here to stay - and, hopefully, win.

Also note the authorities' attempt to once again link dissent with terrorism. The tactic, while having little if any basis in fact, appears to be clearly designed to alienate the citizenry from the opposition groups as well as pave the way for a potential campaign of repression against said opposition - a campaign that would most likely be run ostensibly under the auspices of the "war on terror".

And - lastly, but not leastly - do consider donating to WEARECHANGE.ORG as they are doing some very important work for all of the humanity.

- Boris Epstein

“Activism is Terrorism”
Well, According To The Police In NYC...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFIaG_B6298

Here is the google video link which is slightly better quality. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4595549125769530433&

You can download your own .wmv of the video (approx. 350MB) below: Right-Click this and save-as

The activists of NY911TRUTH and Change were taking part in street actions for the Eleventh of every month. They started at the new WTC Building 7, in which Larry Silverstein was present in his office. Luke Rudkowski and Tom Foti held the banner up that stated that 911 was an inside job. They were peacefully demonstrating giving out flyers and DVDs to whoever was willing to listen. Soon after undercover police officers and Port Authority officers arrived. They told the activists that the space and Greenwich Street is privately owned by Larry Silverstein. Therefore, the officers ordered the activists to cease and desist and to leave the premise or be arrested. The activists refused since they were not breaking any laws and were constitutionally upholding their civilian duties.

The officers then intimidated the activists by going face to face with them and tried to restrict them from filming the incident. The officers expressed amusement as they stated that the activists were going to jail. The officers quickly labeled us as terrorists and claimed that we had backpack explosives. The officers said, “You could be a terrorist, how should I know you don't have a bomb in your book bag?” They continued saying that Luke Rudkowski’s string on his Northface book bag contained explosive material. Soon after many more police officers arrived and surrounded the activists from a distance.

Another group of police officers detained the activists for an hour, until they were approached directly by the Port Authority officer in charge, who escorted them from the premises. As Luke was filming the incident, about 10 officers surrounded him as well as Tom and actually confiscated Luke’s camera when it was filming and alleged that it was a gun. It should be noted that the officers never identified themselves and many did not show their badges to the activists. When a citizen stated that they have every right to record police altercations, the officer replied, “Yes, but you could have a gun in your camera.” The officers did not return Luke’s camera until the activists were set free.

When Luke tried to use his cell phone to contact Alex Jones on his radio show to make a public statement about what was happening, the police officer snatched Luke’s phone and labeled it a gun as well. As the activists were stating their rights, the police officers mimicked them by bullying and questioning whether they went to law school. Although the activists did not leave the area they moved away from the NYPD and continued holding the banner that stated 911 was an inside job. This altercation shows how far the NYPD can go to hinder free speech.

We stand in defiance and in the memory of one of our fallen members of NY911TRUTH and CHANGE, Dan Wallace. The activists of NY911TRUTH and CHANGE will not stop until the truth about 911 comes out. They will continue to demonstrate on the 11th of every month at locations like the Path Station at Ground Zero, Pace University, the Brooklyn Bridge and Times Square in the hopes of spreading the message that 911 was an inside job.

Please Donate to www.WeAreChange.org so we can buy a hidden camera, so next time the police snatch away our cameras we will be able to show the world these illegal acts.

3/18/07 AntiWar Protest in Albany, NY featuring 9/11 Truth UAlbany

Check out the antiwar rally in front of the Capitol in Albany, NY on the 4th anniversary of the Iraq War. Included in the march were members of 9/11 Truth UAlbany, who also protested in front of Governor Eliot Spitzer's Mansion in the South End of Albany.

Check out 9/11 Truth UAlbany at: www.911truthualbany.org

Google Video link

"Mainstream Media & 9/11 - Blatant Mind Control Propaganda!"

1 April 2007
By Boris Epstein

YouTube link

This is a presentation worth watching to get a glimpse into how the modern media can by way of selective censorship cover a topic in a way that ridicules one of the sides in the debate from the start and denies the audience an opportunity to acquire knowledge of the subject or form an informed opinion of said subject. It is, of course, shocking when the subject at hand is something as crucially important as the tragic events of 9/11 - which, aside from their own enormity, have since been presented as basis for a revolutionary transformation of the American policy.

It also shows how myths are created by way of presenting certain opinions as apriori unassailable and subject only to unquestioning acceptance. The "9/11 heretics" are given some air time, of course. I must say that only started after the 9/11 Truth movement has grown too large to be ignored by the mainstream media but let us not dwell on that point. However, when those "heretics" are given the light of day it is generally only after a somewhat derisive introduction, only very briefly and only in such a way as to deny them an opportunity to present their views in any fashion that even smells of seriousness. That is a subtle, though effective, way to reinforce the official 9/11 myth.

For more on the myth making see an excellent article titled 9/11: The Myth and the Reality by Dr. David Ray Griffin's who also happens to be featured in the video above.

Peace March, Boston, Massachusetts, March 24, 2007

Google Video link

9/11 Truth Film Festival, February 9-11, 2007, Cambridge, MA

The text below is extracted from an email. The venue is The Democracy Center (map).

Due to my schedule which as of late has been quite erratic and unconventional I may or may not be able to attend but I would strongly recommend visiting it regardless of what your position is on 9/11.

9/11 Truth Film Festival
February 9-11
The Democracy Center
45 Mt. Auburn St.
Cambridge, MA
Friday 6 PM to 12 AM
Saturday 12 PM to 12 AM
Sunday 12 PM to 8 PM
Free admission and popcorn

An evidence-based, scientifically-sound look into what really happened on 9/11.
26 hours of spellbinding documentaries about 9/11 and related topics.

"Nineteen Eighty-Four"

A film based on George Orwell's famous book, courtesy Google Video.

'The Ground Truth' documentary in Malden, Jan. 24

The following announcement has been e-mailed to me. You can also watch 'The Ground Truth' online. The location for the screening is 2 Elm Street, Malden, MA 02148.

THE GROUND TRUTH
A documentary film by Patricia Foulkrod
Wednesday, January 24, at 7 pm
First Parish in Malden, Universalist
Elm and Pleasant Streets (Route 60), Malden

Hear and witness the lives of our soldiers in this penetrating film. The
Iraq ground conflict is only a prelude to the challenging battles our
veterans face upon their return home.

This film is one of 15 on the Academy Award's short list for Documentary
Features. This film is recommended for mature audiences. A discussion will
follow. Refreshments served. Donation requested.

Presented by the Malden Area Citizens Against War and the First Parish in
Malden.

Directions:
First Parish in Malden, a Unitarian Universalist
congregation, is located at Elm and Pleasant Streets (Route
60), a few blocks west of the Malden Center T station (Orange line).
Free parking is available in the lot between the church and the
Beebe Elementary School. The church facility is wheelchair
accessible. Call 781-322-0474 or visit www.malden.ma.uua.org
for more information.

"The Ground Truth: The Human Cost of War"

Hailed as "powerful" and "quietly unflinching," Patricia Foulkrod's searing documentary feature includes exclusive footage that will stir all audiences. The filmmaker's subjects are patriotic young Americans - ordinary men and women who heeded the call for military service in Iraq - as they experience recruitment and training, combat, homecoming, and the struggle to reintegrate with families and communities. The terrible conflict in Iraq, depicted with ferocious honesty in the film, is a prelude for the even more challenging battles fought by the soldiers returning home – with personal demons, an uncomprehending public, and an indifferent government. As these battles take shape, each soldier becomes a new kind of hero, bearing witness and giving support to other veterans, and learning to fearlessly wield the most powerful weapon of all - the truth.

Google Video link

The Ground Truth homepage

"The True Lies of 9/11"

By Aidan Monaghan

Part 1

YouTube link

Part 2

YouTube link

Discussion on 911Blogger.com

New Orleans: Big Easy to Big Empty

August 29th, 2006 marked the one year anniversary of the devastation in New Orleans caused by the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. This Special Report brings you exclusive footage and the stories you won't hear on the other networks--the hidden political agendas and the suppressed eyewitness reports. Includes on-the-spot reporting from independent journalist Greg Palast.

In this half-hour film, Greg Palast and his team travel to New Orleans to investigate what has happened since Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast last year. On his visit, he discovers that the population of New Orleans is miniscule, the reconstruction sparse, suicide rates are climbing, and many have not, nor know how to, return to the city that care forgot. He examines why residents had to leave, what really caused the flood and why they aren't returning.

Bonus Features Include: Tomorrow's New Orleans - Whose City Will it Be? A half-hour conversation with Amy Goodman and Greg Palast where they sit down to discuss who is accountable for the ongoing disastrous situation in New Orleans.

Google Video link

See also:
Refuge of Last Resort

Spooky Halloween Post: Louisiana's Real-Life Ghost Towns

Katrina trip: short timeline

Fleet of rescue boats was ready to rescue New Orleans residents, but no-one at FEMA could "authorize it"

Incompetence? Crime? You decide

Fifty Dollars and a Dream

Doctor says FEMA ordered him to stop treating hurricane victims

The Forever Elsewhere Management Agency

The federal response to Katrina is a disaster in its own right

My Katrina-related Link Blog entries

Iraq Veterans Against War Deployed In New Orleans

Members of Iraq Veterans Against War, Darrell Anderson, Ethen Kuruel, Mike Cuzzort and War resister Kyle Snyder Talk about their experiences while volunteering to rebuild New Orleans.

Google Video link

New Orleans Voices For Peace article

Oklahoma City Bombing: live local TV coverage soon after the event

from disinfo.com

Disinformation: After the bombing, while the rescue attempts were going on, the Oklahoma TV News stations were reporting that the police and ATF officials were saying that there were more undetonated bombs found in the building. The TV newsmen kept reporting this for hours. Police logs confirmed undetonated bombs were found, and so did FEMA reports. Even Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating, on the morning of the bombing, said, "The reports I have is that one device was deactivated, and apparently, there's another device." But since then the government has claimed that all these reports and sightings of other bombs were wrong. That there was only the one McVeigh truck bomb. Does that make sense? Do you believe that?

Charles Key: Yes, the information is just very strong, and to me it's too strong to be able to try to discount it. We have affidavits in our report from paramedics and other rescuers at the scene who say they heard law enforcement people stating there were other bombs found in the building. And then you had bomb experts who had time to drive to a TV station, and sit there, and talk about the un-detonated bombs they had, bombs that were found in the building. You know, it's just too much competent information that can't be reasoned away as mistakes.

Disinformation: In that same TV interview, Governor Keating, who is an ex-FBI agent, said, ". . . obviously, whatever did the damage to the Murrah Building was a tremendous, very sophisticated explosive device." But explosives experts have made it clear that an ANFO bomb is an extremely rudimentary bomb. If someone blew up the building by placing charges on different columns inside the buildings, then that would take a sophisticated knowledge of explosives, right?

Charles Key: Yes. Authorities have said that an ANFO bomb is a very simple, crude bomb.

Disinformation: What might be the most intriguing information you put out in your Final Report is that the most preeminent experts on explosives--people like Sam Cohen and General Partin--have said an ANFO truck bomb could not have possibly done the damage to the Murrah Building. You've said that the Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee tried very hard to find an expert or authority who would say that an ANFO bomb could have done the damage, but you weren't able to, right?

Charles Key: That's true. Yes. We couldn't find anybody who would put their name, put their opinion in writing, that an ANFO truck bomb could have done this. If somebody wants to claim that it could have been done, then they need to put in writing, show how it could work, and give examples of that. And nobody I know of has been able to do that. Not even the witnesses the government used in the trial could do it. They didn't do it...

http://www.disinfo.com/arch...
www.prisonplanet.tv

www.st911.org

YouTube link


See also:
The Oklahoma City Bombing

And now back to Oklahoma City and all those years and events since...

"Lifting the Fog": a presentation by Prof. Steven E Jones, November 11, 2006, UC Berkeley Campus

This is the recording of a live webcast of Steven Jones' presentation from the Lifting the Fog conference held on the campus of UC Berkeley thanks to 911Truth.org

Google video link


911Blogger.com discussion

"9-11 Press for Truth" to be screened in Dover, NH today

I just received the following e-mail:

Monday, Oct. 16, at 7 pm: The Seacoast 9-11 Questions Committee will be showing the film "9-11 Press For Truth" at Dover Friends Meetinghouse, 141 Central Ave. in Dover. Kyle Hence, the executive producer of the film and the co-founder of www.911truth.org will be there to introduce the film and answer questions. The "Jersey Girls" and the 911 Families play big roles in the film, stripping away the cover-up and leaving the questions, bigger than ever, behind. This film is a powerful, moving and intelligent exposition of the impact of 911 in the words of survivors and through the carefully collated, analyzed, and connected stories appearing in the press here and overseas. Much of the content is based on author Paul Thompson’s The Complete 9/11 Timeline. Sponsored by the Seacoast 9-11 Questions Committee and Seacoast Peace Response. For more information contact David Diamond at ddiam@ttlc.net or phone 603-749-9159.